TheConservativePundit

Obama Campaign Removes Newspapers Endorsing McCain from Plane

In case you haven't heard, and there isn't a bold headline on Dallasnews.com to show the outrage, the Obama Campaign has removed reporters from three newspapers (Washington Times, New York Post, and Dallas Morning News) from it's plane because of so-called "space issues." Is it just coincidence that all three newspapers have endorsed John McCain?

The interesting spin coming from the Dallas Morning Snooze is facisnating. One, like I said earlier, isn't a large article on their website about this - just one relagated to the side bar...and it's their blog, not a news story.  The blog, trailblazers, writes several interesting parapgraphs that shows they aren't TOO upset...is it so they can get their seat back? It's funny that a paper that accused McCain of "fear-mongering" isn't going after Obama's campaign for dropping them from O-FORCE-ONE.

Here are some snippets from their blog:

"But we don't have evidence that the newspaper's endorsement of Sen. McCain had any bearing on the campaign's decision to boot us from the plane. No one from the campaign every mentioned it to Todd [Gilliam]." Uhm, excuse me, are they actually going to TELL YOU you're being removed for endorsing McCain? And if the role were to be reversed, would YOU NEED evidence? I dont' think so.

"We think the Obama campaign's decision is to some degree more a function of limited seats..." To Some Degree? Wait, you have no evidence that it had anything to do with the endorsement...so shouldn't be to 100 DEGREES?


"And it does seem true that the campaign is allowing for more friendly media. But that should come as no surprise - Sen. Obama hasn't done a press conference in more than a month, but he's given "exclusive" interviews to Jon Stewart, Rachel Maddow and Mario Lopez. (Don't know this media titan? He's the host of "Extra," an entertainment news show, and a former star of "Saved By The Bell.") This should tell you something - Sen. Obama is sitting on a lead and doesn't want to risk aggressive questions by unbiased political reporters." Really now, more friendly media? This guy has had 95% friendly media, including the Dallas Snooze. The DMN covered up a change in which their guy Todd Gilliam changed a headline saying McCain has resorted to fear mongering to scare tactics. This should be the lead paragraph and is instead burried at the end. Funny!

The Ad You Won't See

Have you heard about the Manhattan Mini Storage Ad (Courtesy MichelleMalkin.com) where it attacks Sarah Palin? What's more limited? Your closet or her experience?

Think this ad below will ever be used by Manhattan Mini Storage?

Hmmm, doubt it!

Democrats Don't Like Truth About Being Baby Killers

For a few minutes, I wrestled with that title but that is really what it comes down to...they don't like the truth when the truth hurts...and the truth is their candidate voted to allow babies to die and that is indisputable. Amanda Carpenter of Townhall.com wrote an outstanding piece on this issue.

"Newly discovered documents from the Illinois state archives prove Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has lied about his opposition as an Illinois state senator to legislation requiring health officials to provide care to babies who survived abortion," writes Amanda.

She adds, "Contrary to what Obama has said, forgotten records from the Illinois Senate archives show Obama did vote against a BAIPA bill that included such a neutrality clause virtually identical to the federal bill."

And in case you believe bias is driving this, thus altering it's truth, the Associated Press reported this on the day of the vote: "The Senate Health and Human Services Committee rejected a bill that declares any fetus with a beating heart or muscle movement outside the womb as ‘born alive,” said AP reporter Kristy Hessman.

You see, there were ten members of a sub committee that Obama chaired that had a recorded vote on the BAIPA bill and Barack Obama was one of the six that voted to deny medical treatment to an infant that was alive even after a botched partial birth abortion. 

What this means, simply put, is Barack Obama is FAR MORE LIBERAL than he wants the American Public to think. Not even did NARAL opposed this measure! And he's been lying about this the entire time, but the MSM will not report on this.

Understand this, partial birth abortion is the killing of the baby seconds befor it would be a live human being. The fourth and final step is described even by the left leaning wikipedia as "the brian and material inside the skull is evacuated, so that a dead but otherwise intact fetus can be delivered." Putting it more directly, the brian is sucked out of the skull just before final birth. This hideous act is supported by Barack Obama!

It was this deplorable act that caused me to visit a polling place this morning and let voters know that Barack Obama was one of six senators in Illinois that voted to allow babies to be killed. And that's when the Obamabots went nuts and brought out the election judge. Of course, sympathetic to the Obamabots, the judge threatened to call the police and followed me to my car to write down my license plate. Free speech? Not if you dare say anything about the Messiah.

If you care about innocent human life, please pass this on to your family and friends. Go to the polls and tell the voters that this deplorable act is supported by Barack Obama. Pass the video below on to everyone as well. We can work hard to stop this man from being President.

The Biggest Obama Advantage: The MSM

Barack Obama said recently that FOX News is costing him "2-3 points" in an interview with the New York Times....hmmm, imagine where he would be without the Main Stream Media?

Just over a month ago, September 16th in fact, John McCain was leading the RealClearPolitics.Com average. What is significant about that is is it was the beginning of the economic meltdown ...specifically the AIG Bailout. You see, this was the burst of a housing bubble that was created by the Democrats...which brings me to the MSM help Barack Obama has received in this election.

Imagine a scenario where all the evidence pointed to the GOP being front and center in this mess. Imagine a set of Republican Congressmen being on tape during a hearing saying that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were fine. Imagine the Republican Nominee receiving the largest amount of donations from Freddie and Fannie?

Imagine my surprise to read an article today about Former HUD Secretary Henry Cisneros and his comments in the New York Times virtually taking blame for this bubble. "People came to homeownership who should not have been homeowners," said Cisneros.  In fact, the words of the NYT isn't too kind either when it said "While Mr. Cisneros says he remains proud of his work, he has misgivings over what his passion has wrought. [Cisneros] encouraged the unprepared to buy homes – part of a broad national trend with dire economic consequences."

Gotcha, right there in print, the MSM assigning blame to a Democrat but have we heard anything from this news story? Nope! In fact, he figured the criticism would be squarely on him by adding "I've been waiting for someone to put all the blame at my doorstep."

Sadly, Cisneros profited by this by joining the board of KB Homes and Countrywide Home Loans. His record has never been clean of scandal, he's lucky to be a Democrat.

Now this is a clear sign of the bias of the MSM, again imagine if this had been a Republican HUD Secretary...the rumblings would be numbing on the Sunday talk shows. This entire mess we're in is undeniably a result of forced regulations by Democrats who think "faireness" is written into the Constitution. Forcing banks to lend to those who were not financially able, admitted by Cisneros, was the cause of this and there are direct ties to Obama and his association with ACORN that would has been ignored by the MSM.

Which goes to the core of this election, Liberal Socialistic Government First policies of Barack Obama/Harry Reid/Nancy Pelosi versus free-market non-forced Government policies of John McCain.  Obama in fact even hinted, in what could be the reason he loses this election, when he told Joe The Plumber he wanted to "share the wealth."  Then again, Obama has also built this campaign on lies told over and over again.

"John McCain must be the first politician in history to call a tax cut for working people 'welfare," says Obama. Hmmm, another lie from Obama, when in fact 40% of America does not pay taxes so there isn't anything to cut...getting a check for nothing is welfare, plain and simple.

But according to a Dallas Morning News found expert, our current tax system is socialsim. From the DMN, "William Wallace, a former vice president and chief operating officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, said the country's progressive tax code, which Mr. McCain does not propose abolishing, is "socialist in nature."

Wallace, a professor at the University of North Texas, added "But to say we are headed toward socialism is a vast overstatement in my book." Hmm, when we take money from the masses and redistribute it...or force a governmental health care system on the masses...that is socialism on the rise Professor Wallace!

With the help of the NYT and other MSM outlets, Barack Obama has received a free pass. McCain can still win this election, if and when he makes the outcome America First or Socialism First. The power of the American people or the power of the American Government. It's really that simple.

McCain / Obama Debate 2

Live Blogging of the McCain / Obama Debate

8:00 Debate Begins... Broakaw starts with the economy, and Obama wins the toss....Most Recent Comments on the top.

We all know what the left will say Obama won this debate even before it started.  Regardless of the outcome.

Memories of John Kennedy

I have been making the arguments amongst friends that one thing I would like to see out of a debate is a clear definition between the liberal Democrat and the conservative Republican.

John F. Kennedy did an outstanding job in the 1960 debate looking at Nixon and saying, and I am paraphrasing, "Mr Nixon is on the stage as the representative of the Republican Party, the Leader of the Republican Party and here is what the party stands for..."

Sarah Palin did this at the end of the debate with the following "But the policies and the proposals have got to speak for themselves, also. And, again, voters on November 4th are going to have that choice to either support a ticket that supports policies that create jobs.

You do that by lowering taxes on American workers and on our businesses. And you build up infrastructure, and you rein in government spending, and you make our -- our nation energy independent.

Or you support a ticket that supports policies that will kill jobs by increasing taxes. And that's what the track record shows, is a desire to increase taxes, increase spending, a trillion-dollar spending proposal that's on the table. That's going to hurt our country, and saying no to energy independence. Clear choices on November 4th."

It's just that simple, ladies and gentleman, when we go to vote. The Obama/Biden ticket will raise taxes, surrender in Iraq, reduce job growth, allow babies to be killed, and over regulate American businesses. With McCain/Palin, you get lower taxes, protection of human life and the true defenition of marriage, energy independence, lower gas and oil prices indexed to inflation, and spur new jobs.

This is a clear distinction between moving America in the right direction or the wrong direction, policies of the left that hurt America versus policies of the right that strengthen America. Two world views, on display, for America to see...and I am proud to be on the right side and not the left!

Is This The Obama Doctrine?

There is an important point that could (only if the Main Stream Media cared) have huge significance in this Presidential Election, we may now have the 'Obama Doctrine.'

Gwen Ifill, who did a remarkably fair job considering she has a vested financial interest in this election, moved the topic of interventionism. After a series of responses, she followed up with Joe Biden by asking

“is there a line that should be drawn about when we decide to go in?” 

The response speaks volumes about the hypocrisy of Biden and the lack of judgment by Barack Obama for picking him.

“When a country engages in genocide, when a country engaging in harboring terrorists and will do nothing about it, at that point that country in my view and Barack's view forfeits their right to say you have no right to intervene at all.”

Hmm, Really? Think about this for a second, it is now the policy of Obama/Biden that the line to determine U.S. action is “when a country engages in genocide…or harbor’s terrorists and will do nothing about it.”

Let’s look at a country that falls into this category. During a period in March of 1988, during the Iran-Iraq war, Chemical Weapons were used by Iraqi forces in the Kurdish town of Halabja to kill thousands of people. In fact, Human Rights Watch classified this as “genocide.”

Terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi fled to Iraq in 2002 where he fought against Kurdish nationals. It is known that Zarqawi joined forces with terrorists who had been in Iraq since 1998. Remember, this is before we went into Iraq in 2003. He has significant ties to Osama Bin laden and Al Qaeda.

So, here we have two clear examples of using the Obama/Biden standard that justifies America going into Iraq. Question is, will the main stream media pick up on the fact that this new Obama Doctrine introduced by Joe Biden during the debate will highlight the hypocrisy of inexperience coming from the left-ticket for President.

But Obama, in his campaign speeches, has ridiculed the decision to go in Iraq and his choice for VP has just given justification for doing just that as I define it as The Obama Doctrine!

Barack never said what?

Biden just said Obama never wanted to talk directly to Dictators? Excuse me? Joe doesn't remember the debates?  Joe Biden lied when he said that Barack Obama never said that he would sit down unconditionally with Mahmoud Ahmedinijad of Iran. Barack Obama did say specifically, and Joe Biden attacked him for it.

Biden is on the ropes

Joe Biden is losing BIG time! Another great line by Sarah "Barack Obama's plan to mandate health care coverage and have universal government run program and unless you're pleased with the way the federal government has been running anything lately, I don't think that it's going to be real pleasing for Americans to consider health care being taken over by the feds."

Way to go Sarah

"I may not answer the questions that either the moderator or you want to hear, but I'm going to talk straight to the American people and let them know my track record also"... BINGO!